Close Menu
maincoin.money
    What's Hot

    Quantum Computing: Years Away from Posing a Risk to Bitcoin, Asserts VC Amit Mehra

    November 1, 2025

    Bitcoin ETFs Experience Significant Withdrawals as BTC Price Falls to $108,000

    November 1, 2025

    Bitcoin Stays in Range as Altcoins React to Spot BTC ETF Sell-off

    November 1, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    maincoin.money
    • Home
    • Altcoins
    • Markets
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • DeFi
    • Ethereum
    • NFTs
      • Regulation
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    maincoin.money
    Home»Regulation»DeFiLlama Subtly Reintroduces Aster Following Data Integrity Controversy
    Regulation

    DeFiLlama Subtly Reintroduces Aster Following Data Integrity Controversy

    Ethan CarterBy Ethan CarterOctober 20, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    1760954674
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    DefiLlama, the decentralized finance (DeFi) data aggregator, has quietly restored decentralized exchange (DEX) Aster to its analytics platform after delisting it weeks ago due to disputed trading data.

    Dragonfly managing partner Haseeb Qureshi highlighted this update on X, pointing out that there had been no public discussion or announcement from either Aster or DefiLlama. He also mentioned significant “gaps” in the historical data and inquired with pseudonymous DefiLlama founder “0xngmi” about the legitimacy of the numbers.

    In response, 0xngmi indicated that the team could not yet verify the numbers, referring to it as a “black box.” He added that while DefiLlama is in the process of developing a new system to include additional metrics, Aster’s team requested to be relisted in the interim.

    “We’re working on a solution that will incorporate other metrics for improvement, but since this may take some time, the Aster team has requested us to relist them in the meantime,” 0xngmi stated.

    019a00f0 fc10 769c a2bc 12794a8fdc8f
    Source: 0xngmi

    Aster data controversy ignites transparency discussion

    Aster was initially delisted two weeks ago after inconsistencies were identified in its on-chain trading data, raising concerns about the validity of some reported activities.

    On Oct. 6, 0xngmi stated that the platform does not allow for tracking who places and fills orders, meaning it cannot differentiate between wash trading and legitimate activity.

    The incident surrounding Aster’s delisting sparked a broader discussion about the influence of data providers. Supporters of Aster accused DefiLlama of centralization, while critics questioned whether Aster’s rise to prominence was authentic or orchestrated.

    This delisting episode showcased the ongoing challenge of establishing truth in decentralized markets and demonstrated how quickly data-related issues can erode trust.

    Related: DeFi TVL reaches a record $237B as daily active wallets decline 22% in Q3: DappRadar

    Aster relisting resulted in data discrepancies

    Although Aster’s metrics are now visible on DefiLlama again, the absence of historical data has led to gaps.

    This results in fragmented longitudinal comparisons, such as market-share trends, fee leaderboards, or cumulative revenue charts. For traders and model builders relying on these metrics, the gaps effectively reset Aster’s historical profile.

    019a00f1 9264 775b bce4 ab3424b2c810
    DefiLlama’s Aster dashboard highlights historical data gaps. Source: DefiLlama

    Following its reinstatement, Aster remained at the top of the leaderboards for 24-hour perp volume and seven-day perp volume, followed closely by major competitors Hyperliquid and Lighter.