South Korea’s top financial regulator ordered crypto exchanges to suspend new digital asset lending services, citing mounting risks and highlighting a need for clear rules.
The Financial Services Commission (FSC) said on Tuesday that it sent letters to exchanges requesting the suspension of new crypto lending until it completes guidelines. Existing contracts, like repayments and maturity extensions, will be permitted.
On July 31, the FSC and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) announced they had formed a joint task force to develop a regulatory framework for crypto lending. The guidelines are expected to cover leverage limits, user eligibility and risk disclosures for virtual asset lending activities.
The FSC said it would conduct on-site inspections and take supervisory action against platforms that failed to comply.
Forced liquidations highlight urgent need for clear rules
The move follows reports of widespread user losses, including thousands of forced liquidations in exchange-run lending programs.
One unidentified exchange drew about 27,600 users in a month after launching a lending service in mid-June, the FSC said. The platform recorded about 1.5 trillion Korean won ($1.1 billion) in volume. Of those users, about 13%, or 3,635 people, suffered forced liquidations as their crypto positions fell in value.
The FSC also pointed to two companies that offered Tether (USDT) lending services, which triggered a surge in selling volume and an unusual decline in USDT prices. The agency said continuing new lending operations without safeguards could further damage investor funds.
Related: South Korean banks plan won-pegged stablecoin launch by 2026
Crypto lending a gray area in South Korea
Since 2020, South Korea has laid foundational regulatory groundwork for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
This includes Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Travel Rule mandates under the revised Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.
In 2023, the country’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act came into force, creating a legal basis for penalties against unfair activities like market manipulation and mishandling of user deposits.
Despite these, crypto lending has remained in a legal gray zone, operating without clear regulatory frameworks or a licensing regime.
Magazine: South Koreans dump Tesla for Ethereum treasury BitMine: Asia Express
