Disclosure: The opinions and perspectives shared here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views or opinions of crypto.news’ editorial team.
The tokenization of real-world assets has skyrocketed to $27 billion, establishing it as the fastest-expanding segment in crypto. Despite headlines touting trillion-dollar potentials, many platforms fail to meet the institutional standards required to unlock genuine capital. The upcoming phase of tokenization focuses not on hype, but on creating infrastructure that institutions can genuinely trust.
Summary
- RWA tokenization surged 118% year-on-year to $27B, driven by BlackRock’s $1.7B BUIDL fund.
- Institutions such as Franklin Templeton and KKR are exploring tokenization, though major allocators remain wary.
- Key challenges include asset commingling, inadequate auditability, and insufficient regulated custody and insurance.
- To attract trillions in institutional capital, platforms must incorporate compliance, real-time audits, and robust custodial safeguards from the outset.
The market for real-world asset tokenization is leading crypto growth, hitting $27 billion, a remarkable 118% increase year-over-year. Over the past year, BlackRock’s BUIDL fund launched $1.7 billion in tokenized U.S. Treasuries, while institutional entities like Franklin Templeton, Apollo, and KKR aim to tokenize various assets, from private credit to real estate, on-chain.
As institutional growth accelerates, the next challenge is evident: RWA platforms must develop infrastructure that meets the specific demands of institutional capital to fulfill the potential benefits for both investors and markets. The quality and reliability of these systems will be crucial as trillions in institutional assets transition to blockchain.
As more players enter the arena, the discrepancy between current developments and actual needs grows, posing increasing risks. With significant amounts at stake, platforms must prioritize incorporating the controls, transparency, and reliability that institutional capital necessitates. By adhering to these standards, RWA tokenization can offer sustainable value for end investors, borrowers, and the broader financial system, unlocking the institutional capital required to develop this trillion-dollar market. Progressive RWA platforms understand that catering to institutions necessitates an evolution beyond early crypto models. The next stage focuses on developing the essential features to attract and protect substantial capital.
The institutional standard: Where RWA infrastructure still falls short
Within financial services, certain standards are fundamental; client assets must be held in separate legal accounts, ensuring recoverability and regulatory protection in case a custodian fails.
Currently, numerous RWA platforms depend on pooled or omnibus wallets, blurring the distinction between client assets and platform funds. This method poses systemic risks: if a protocol is compromised, blending client assets could complicate legal recovery. In the blockchain space, lacking such safeguards turns technical breaches into potential operational and legal disasters.
Moreover, auditability is of utmost importance. While blockchain technology offers transparency, for institutional investors, visibility without audit-ready oversight is insufficient, and many RWA platforms continue to fall short in this regard.
It’s understandable that numerous traditional hedge fund managers remain hesitant about crypto investments, citing concerns regarding auditability and reporting standards. A striking 76% of those not currently engaged with digital assets are unlikely to enter the market within the next three years, up from 54% in 2023. Not adhering to these strict standards results in exclusion from the very institutional capital that could revolutionize this sector.
If RWA tokenization is to fulfill its promise, the industry cannot afford shortcuts. Infrastructure tailored for institutions must inherit regulatory protections, including careful asset segregation, real-time auditability, and regulatory compliance—the same precautions that have supported traditional finance for decades. Without these measures, institutional investors will simply not shift their assets. This transformation is crucial for ensuring that future waves of capital are both substantial and sustainable.
Custody and compliance struggles
Behind every significant allocation of institutional capital lies a framework of regulated custody and insurance. Institutional investors, including pension funds and sovereign wealth managers, will not place billions in a browser extension wallet. Instead, they expect highly certified custodians (SOC2 or ISO) to provide regulatory safeguards and comprehensive insurance to protect clients in instances of loss.
In summary, custody infrastructure is gradually improving, with leading providers showcasing what’s achievable, yet the overall market requires substantial advancements. Elevating these standards industry-wide is critical. Without regulated custody and insurance at scale, even the most innovative platforms may remain locked out of the major institutional capital markets.
A similar gap exists in compliance. DeFi’s promise of unrestricted access was once its most appealing feature, but now, it raises concerns for institutional investors. Without integrated KYC, AML protocols, and verified investor pools, institutional allocators face unacceptable risks. Expanding these frameworks will be essential for fostering wider institutional engagement in the future.
Until RWA platforms prioritize regulated custody, insurance, and compliance alongside technological advancements, the sector will struggle to enter the realm of genuine institutional finance. For tokenization to expand securely, these fundamental systems must be foundational; otherwise, the goal of moving real-world assets on-chain will remain unfulfilled.
The rift between headlines and reality
Even though the RWA tokenization market now surpasses $27 billion, the predominant share is held by crypto-native investors, hedge funds, and stablecoin issuers, rather than by banks, insurers, or pension funds that truly manage institutional capital. Among Fortune 100 companies, only a handful have experimented with tokenization pilots, and even fewer have dedicated real balance sheet capital.
While some platforms have ticked off compliance requirements, acquired accredited certifications, and formed custody partnerships, most of the sector still faces significant regulatory scrutiny in the U.S. Currently, the SEC is advocating for increased disclosures, enhanced investor protections, and clearer legal frameworks before approving RWA tokenization for widespread investment.
The real test is just beginning
The crypto sector is currently at a pivotal juncture. The next influx of institutional capital will gravitate towards platforms designed from the outset with transparency, real-time auditability, segregated and insured custody, and compliance embedded throughout. However, such platforms are still exceptions rather than the rule, during a time when the need for robust, institution-ready infrastructure is urgent. The few platforms that adopt a compliance-first strategy, integrating safeguards and institutional custody from the beginning, are best equipped to meet the standards of Wall Street.
As capital flows in, it is becoming increasingly discerning. Institutional allocators will not commit vast sums to infrastructures lacking trust. The emerging leaders in RWA tokenization will be those that incorporate compliance, auditability, and custodial safeguards into their frameworks from the very start.
