Sam Bankman-Fried claims that the Biden administration has politically targeted him, as creditors raise concerns about the leadership’s strategy regarding FTX bankruptcy repayments, igniting discussions on crypto repayment methods.
As controversy grows, SBF’s remarks gain traction on social media. New assertions from FTX creditors indicate that the bankruptcy process may have hindered repayments in digital assets, raising alarm over the management of creditor losses.
SBF Raises Accusations of Political Motivation
Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX, amplifies his claims of being politically targeted as his recent statements spread online.
He notes that his political alignment shifted from center-left to centrist between 2020 and 2022. According to SBF, the actions of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler and the Biden Justice Department have influenced his evolving viewpoint.
He stated on GETTR that political motivations prompted his arrest and subsequent prosecution. SBF asserts that his substantial donations to Republicans drew attention from the Biden administration.
SBF maintains that his arrest coincided with his scheduled testimony before Congress regarding a crypto regulatory bill, implying that the timing was intentional.
He echoes concerns raised by certain House Republicans, who have sought SEC and DOJ communications, questioning the absence of records from Gensler. SBF contends that critical questions surrounding his prosecution have been largely overlooked by mainstream media.
This discussion was sparked after the convicted crypto entrepreneur posted a message on his X (Twitter) account from prison.
This is not the first instance where his account has drawn attention; a similarly themed “GM” message emerged weeks prior, though it was clarified that a friend, not SBF, was posting on his behalf.
Dispute Over FTX Bankruptcy Repayments
Facing ongoing legal obstacles, SBF asserts that FTX “was solvent and could even repay crypto in kind.” He argues that, without the current bankruptcy leadership, customers may have received digital assets directly rather than US dollars pegged to November 2022 prices, a time when Bitcoin’s value had significantly dropped.
Supporters cite firsthand accounts from FTX creditors. One former UCC member remarked that John J. Ray III’s bankruptcy team set claims at Bitcoin’s market low ($16,500), contrasting with the Genesis bankruptcy, which allowed partial in-kind repayments benefiting creditors during crypto’s 2024 rebound.
Creditors also express discontent over executive bonus approvals amid the FTX bankruptcy. Opponents of SBF argue that asset deficiencies and mismanagement warranted bankruptcy proceedings from the beginning.
Narrative Clash and What Comes Next
As SBF’s appeal date nears, he and his supporters argue that “all customer claims are receiving ‘120%+ of their Nov22 dollar value,’” even though around $380 million remains in dispute, especially for Chinese clients.
In contrast, the bankruptcy leadership claims that converting assets and distributing repayments in dollars provided creditors with stability and fairness.
The ongoing debate regarding facts, perspectives, and bankruptcy methods continues to polarize stakeholders. The outcome may establish significant standards for crypto bankruptcy and regulatory responses, as the FTX case influences the industry’s future strategies for crisis management.
The post Sam Bankman-Fried Alleges Political Targeting as FTX Payout Debate Grows appeared first on BeInCrypto.
