Key takeaways:
CZ’s mention transformed the meme token “4” into a trade, leading one early buyer to turn $3,000 into $2 million.
The catalyst was the hack of BNB Chain’s X account, which gave rise to “4.”
The rise was driven by liquidity flow rather than underlying fundamentals.
Some wallets had already purchased just moments before CZ’s announcement.
On October 1, 2025, BNB Chain’s official X account was hacked and utilized to distribute phishing links. Within hours, the situation evolved into a quirky token on BNB Chain named “4,” humorously referencing reports that the hacker stole only around $4,000.
Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, co-founder and former CEO of Binance, commented on the incident.
That single tweet turned a niche joke into a vibrant market signal as attention surged into a newly established pool with minimal liquidity.
In the ensuing rush, one early investor placed about $3,000 in BNB (BNB) into “4,” witnessing it soar to nearly $2 million in value within hours.
Did you know? When CZ tweets “4,” he refers to point #4 of his 2023 “Do’s & Don’ts”: Ignore FUD, fake news, and attacks, etc. It became a shorthand within the community long before the 4 memecoin emerged.
How a meme turned into a move
1. BNB Chain account hijacked (Oct. 1, 2025)
BNB Chain’s official X account was compromised and used to share phishing links with approximately 4 million followers. The team regained control and issued warnings. From the chaos arose a running joke that the attacker fled with only “$4k.”
2. A joke gets a ticker
Within hours, a new token named 4 was launched on BNB Chain — a nod to the “$4k” meme. Early investors began circling a barely funded liquidity pool.
3. CZ amplifies it
Changpeng “CZ” Zhao discussed the incident with his 10.3 million followers, highlighting the hacker’s modest profit and how the community “bought the memecoin higher.” What began as humor evolved into a real trading signal, attracting human traders and bots alike.
4. The first wave of orders hits
Scanners identified the contract, copy traders queued purchases, and retail investors funneled through aggregators into the same shallow pool. With minimal depth, each filled order raised the next quote. Slippage widened, momentum built, and the chart steepened rapidly.
5. The headline wallet is already in
An address labeled “0x872” purchased early with about $3,000 worth of BNB. As interest surged and liquidity dissipated, that small stake ballooned to approximately $2 million within hours.
Inside the winning wallet
The wallet that made headlines (“0x872”) didn’t appear to be a mastermind’s creation. It invested around $3,000 in BNB into a freshly minted token and, as attention followed, observed its value skyrocket.
The transformation of a modest investment into a significant fortune was attributed to the early entry in a thin pool. When liquidity is low, each new buyer influences the subsequent quote you’d sell into — whether you sell or not.
Then came the pivotal moment every trader both desires and fears: life-changing numbers on the screen with nearly no depth underneath.
On-chain data revealed minimal profit-taking. The address retained over 98% of its portfolio in 4, still around $1.88 million after the initial spike, maximizing potential upside but leaving the position vulnerable if a significant market sell occurred.
The screenshots reflected a similar narrative: approximately $1.8 million in unrealized profit over the week.
“Unrealized” is the key term. Until an order is executed, profit and loss (PnL) remains a possibility. In markets where a single sale can shift the price by several percentage points, even modest trimming requires careful planning. Many traders learn this by returning a win back to par; this wallet, for some time, opted to ride it out.
Flow around the wallet contributed to this cycle. “Smart money” addresses tracked by Lookonchain began accumulating 4, advancing it to become one of the most held tokens on BNB Chain in the following 24 hours.
This feedback loop intensified reflexivity. As more screens lit up and copy trades were executed, the early holder’s unrealized value continued to rise — until a larger seller eventually tested the pool’s depth.
The outcome for 0x872 hinged on two factors: entering the market extremely early and resisting the temptation to cash out immediately.
Did you know? 0x872 wasn’t the only one. Another wallet reportedly purchased minutes before CZ’s post and achieved seven figures in profit within hours — highlighting that timely alerts and feed monitoring can provide a genuine advantage during meme-fueled surges.
When hype outruns depth
So, what lies ahead for the headline wallet? Maximum upside if momentum continues, and maximum downside if a single substantial sell order impacts a shallow pool.
However, it’s essential to remember the catalyst: a compromised official account. Spikes like this draw in phishers and spoof contracts. The takeaway is simple: verify the contract and pool size, plan an exit strategy in advance, and treat screenshots as mere indicators until a transaction is completed.
Posts generate flow, not inherent value; the exit route is often narrower than it appears.
This article does not offer investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading decision carries risk, and readers should conduct their own research before deciding.
