Sure! Here’s a rewritten version of your content while preserving the HTML tags:
Institutional outflows of Bitcoin (BTC) have persisted through Christmas, with the US now recognized as the leading seller of BTC.
Key highlights:
Bitcoin ETFs reported negative net flows on Christmas Eve, resulting in an additional $175 million loss for institutional investment vehicles.
Poor performance is attributed to tax obligations and the expiry of quarterly options.
There remains optimism for a broader recovery following the holiday period.
Analysis: Bitcoin institutional interest expected to return “soon”
Data from UK-based investment firm Farside Investors revealed that on Christmas Eve, US spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced net outflows exceeding $175 million.
Institutional capital in Bitcoin saw little reason to cease activity while Wall Street remained operational this week.
Farside indicates that a prolonged period of selling continued until the last pre-Christmas US trading session closed, with net outflows totaling $175.3 million.
This figure mirrors the results of the preceding five trading days, each concluding “in the red,” with total net outflows reaching $825.7 million. Every trading day since December 15 has shown negative results, except for December 17, which saw net inflows of $457.3 million.

Market participants attributed the ETFs’ lackluster performance to seasonal factors.
“Much of the selling stems from tax loss harvesting, which should conclude soon,” trader Alek mentioned in a post on X.
Alek also pointed out that Friday’s record options expiry event might be influencing risk appetite.
“This is a temporary situation; institutions will resume bidding shortly,” he added.

An accompanying chart highlighted a recent trend: consistent BTC price declines during US trading hours.
The Coinbase Premium, which measures the price difference between Coinbase’s BTC/USD and Binance’s BTC/USDT pairs, has largely remained negative throughout December.
“The US is currently the largest seller of $BTC, while Asia has become the primary buyer of Bitcoin,” summarized crypto analyst and entrepreneur Ted Pillows .

A negative Premium suggests a lack of buying interest from the US, which some believe Bitcoin needs to regain in order to sustain higher price levels.
$BTC 9 days ago at 90K level Coinbase premium became fully negative and has been persistent since then. Also, price can’t break that 90K level, keeps rejecting from there. I think once it is reclaimed with premium turning positive, you go long and don’t fade the rally. pic.twitter.com/AByz9tPoFA
— exitpump (@exitpumpBTC) December 24, 2025
Bitcoin, Ether ETFs stagnant since early November
In a glimmer of optimism for 2026, trader BitBull noted that negative ETF netflows, even on a 30-day moving average, do not indicate “final market tops.”
Related: Bitcoin institutional purchases turn new supply around for the first time in 6 weeks
“Price stabilizes first, flows become neutral, and only then do inflows reappear. Currently, the data suggests liquidity is inactive, not extinguished,” he shared with X followers, concerning the tendencies of both Bitcoin and Ether (ETH) ETFs.
“A trend reversal is likely to begin with ETF flows turning positive again before price makes a significant move.”

Since the beginning of November, the 30-day moving average of netflows has been consistently negative.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
Let me know if you need any further modifications!
