Close Menu
maincoin.money
    What's Hot

    Positive and Negative Indicators for BTC, ETH, and Layer 2s

    October 19, 2025

    NYDIG Declares, ‘Stablecoins Aren’t Tied to $1’ Following $500B Market Loss

    October 19, 2025

    Michael Saylor Suggests Potential New Bitcoin Acquisition as Strategy Outperforms Treasuries

    October 19, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    maincoin.money
    • Home
    • Altcoins
    • Markets
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • DeFi
    • Ethereum
    • NFTs
      • Regulation
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    maincoin.money
    Home»Ethereum»Is Bitcoin Lending by Babylon Labs Really Trustless?
    Ethereum

    Is Bitcoin Lending by Babylon Labs Really Trustless?

    Ethan CarterBy Ethan CarterOctober 16, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    1760636636
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A co-founder of the Bitcoin infrastructure firm, Babylon Labs, has announced the development of a system that enables native Bitcoin to be utilized as trustless collateral for borrowing on the Ethereum blockchain.

    In a post on X this Wednesday, David Tse, co-founder of Babylon Labs and a Stanford University professor, stated that the company has created a proof-of-concept that allows native Bitcoin (BTC) “to be used trustlessly as collateral to borrow on Ethereum for the first time.”

    This announcement follows the early August release of a white paper outlining a Bitcoin trustless vault system. The system utilizes the Bitcoin smart contract verification mechanism BitVM3 to secure BTC in user-specific vaults, with withdrawals (redemption or liquidation) contingent on cryptographic proofs of external smart contract states verified on Bitcoin.

    This innovation enables users to lock Bitcoin and transfer it to Ethereum without depending on a federated custodian or bridge. On the Ethereum side, a smart contract authenticates the BTC vault through a Bitcoin light client before calculating collateral.

    An experimental version of the resulting token is currently available on the on-chain lending protocol Morpho, though it is still in the testing phase, with total market liquidity of $14 in USDC. Tse described VaultBTC as “an intermediate non-fungible asset that connects the vault with Morpho, enabling depositors and liquidators to trustlessly withdraw BTC.”

    0199ece1 ad9f 71db 8802 8a701f98b9f8
    A schematic of the Bitcoin vault-based lending system. Source: Babylon Labs

    At the time of publication, Babylon Labs and Tse had not replied to Cointelegraph’s request for commentary.

    Related: Kraken launches Bitcoin staking with Babylon integration

    How trustless is it?

    While certain aspects of the system are trustless, others are not. According to the white paper, the liquidation of Babylon’s Bitcoin vaults involves whitelisted liquidators supervising the price and vault state, leading to a system that is not entirely permissioned and introduces trust requirements.

    Despite co-signing measures designed to mitigate censorship, the framework still presupposes that enough liquidators (and occasionally major lenders) will act correctly. While the design of the system prevents them from stealing Bitcoin, it still necessitates a trust assumption.

    0199ecef df30 7498 9357 eee5d5c7d7f3
    Bitcoin vault liquidation schematic. Source: Babylon Labs

    Liquidations depend on a price oracle, making them susceptible to the oracle’s accuracy, promptness, and resistance to censorship. If the oracle fails or is delayed, erroneous decisions occur. Oracle providers, such as Band Protocol and Pyth Network, did not respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment by publication.

    Related: The future of DeFi isn’t on Ethereum — it’s on Bitcoin

    What really changes?

    The white paper presents a straightforward scenario: “Bob possesses 1 BTC and wants to borrow $50,000 in a stablecoin from Larry through a lending protocol on Ethereum.” In this case, if Bitcoin’s value falls below $50,000, Larry has the right to liquidate the collateral. If Bob repays the loan as scheduled, he retrieves the BTC.

    Babylon Labs indicates that existing systems involve multiple trust assumptions. Bob could choose to hand his Bitcoin to Larry for safekeeping, trusting he will return it.

    Alternatively, Bob could retain his Bitcoin and allow Larry to liquidate it should its price drop — but this requires Larry to rely on Bob’s integrity. Lastly, Bob could bridge his Bitcoin to Ethereum as Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) and use it as collateral in a smart contract. However, he must place trust in the wrapping mechanism itself.

    WBTC entails trust because its backing Bitcoin is held by a centralized custodian who must be relied upon not to lose, freeze, or mishandle the funds. Users depend on the custodian’s honesty and stability rather than cryptographic assurances. This issue is what Babylon’s trustless implementation aims to resolve.

    “Trustless vaults remove all such trust assumptions. Bob and Larry jointly pre-sign a collection of Bitcoin transactions outlining conditional spending rights,” the white paper asserts.

    Magazine: ‘Debasement trade’ will pump Bitcoin, Ethereum DATs will win: Hodler’s Digest, Oct. 5 – 11